snapshot of https://github.com/marmelab/atomic-crm.git (main, 2026-09-18; blobs > 131072B omitted)
Some checks failed
✅ Check / 🔬 ESLint (push) Failing after 21s
✅ Check / 🏷️ Typecheck (push) Failing after 11s
✅ Check / 🔎 Test (push) Failing after 11s
✅ Check / e2e-test (push) Failing after 11s
✅ Check / 🔨 Build (push) Failing after 11s
🚀 Deploy / 🚀 Deploy (doc) (push) Failing after 12s
🚀 Deploy / 🚀 Deploy (demo) (push) Failing after 12s
🚀 Deploy / 🚀 Deploy (supabase) (push) Failing after 18s
Some checks failed
✅ Check / 🔬 ESLint (push) Failing after 21s
✅ Check / 🏷️ Typecheck (push) Failing after 11s
✅ Check / 🔎 Test (push) Failing after 11s
✅ Check / e2e-test (push) Failing after 11s
✅ Check / 🔨 Build (push) Failing after 11s
🚀 Deploy / 🚀 Deploy (doc) (push) Failing after 12s
🚀 Deploy / 🚀 Deploy (demo) (push) Failing after 12s
🚀 Deploy / 🚀 Deploy (supabase) (push) Failing after 18s
This commit is contained in:
38
.claude/skills/grill-me/SKILL.md
Normal file
38
.claude/skills/grill-me/SKILL.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: grill-me
|
||||
description: Interrogate a vague or broad feature request BEFORE dispatching the harness orchestrator, to surface what the user has not anticipated. Use in the main thread when a #harness request is underspecified, when scope seems broad, or when a plan would come out too generic. Not for the orchestrator (headless, cannot ask).
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# grill-me
|
||||
|
||||
Ask probing questions about the request before any plan or code, to surface
|
||||
what the user has NOT anticipated, not just confirm what they already said.
|
||||
|
||||
## How
|
||||
|
||||
- **One question at a time**, in prose. Never a multiple-choice menu, never a
|
||||
batch of five at once.
|
||||
- Read the answer, then ask the next most valuable question given it.
|
||||
- **Stop as soon as the scope is answerable** (roughly: you could write the
|
||||
orchestrator dispatch prompt without guessing). Do not interrogate for its
|
||||
own sake.
|
||||
|
||||
## Cover, at minimum
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Scope-out**: what is explicitly NOT in scope? What might look included but isn't?
|
||||
2. **Edge cases**: empty / invalid input, network or backend error, two users at once.
|
||||
3. **Existing interactions**: does this touch behavior already in place (permissions,
|
||||
RLS, cached data, shared views, another resource)?
|
||||
4. **Definition of done**: what manual check confirms it works? Who validates before merge?
|
||||
5. **Reversibility**: if it turns out wrong, how hard is it to undo?
|
||||
|
||||
If the user answers "I don't know" to a structural question, propose an explicit
|
||||
hypothesis and ask them to confirm rather than silently choosing.
|
||||
|
||||
## After grilling
|
||||
|
||||
Fold the answers into the orchestrator dispatch prompt (scope-out and
|
||||
acceptance become ticket constraints). Then dispatch the harness as usual.
|
||||
|
||||
The orchestrator never invokes this skill: it runs headless and cannot hold an
|
||||
interactive back-and-forth. Grilling is a main-thread, pre-dispatch step.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user