snapshot of https://github.com/mattermost/mattermost.git (master, 2026-09-16; blobs > 131072B omitted)

e2e-tests/playwright/specs/functional/channels/content_flagging/reviewer-actions/reviewer-actions.spec.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+// Copyright (c) 2015-present Mattermost, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
+// See LICENSE.txt for license information.
+
+import {test} from '@mattermost/playwright-lib';
+
+import {setupContentFlagging, createPost, verifyAuthorNotification} from './../support';
+
+/** @objective Verify Removed Flagged posts show appropriate status and do not show the post message
+ * @testcase
+ * 1. Create three users and add them as reviewers to a team
+ * 2. Setup content flagging with the three users as reviewers
+ * 3. Create a post and flag it
+ * 4. As Reviewer 1, walk through the multi-step removal flow (form → report generated → remove permanently)
+ * 5. As Reviewer 2, verify the flagged post status is 'Removed' and the message has been replaced
+ */
+test('Verify Removed Flagged posts show appropriate status and do not show the post message', async ({pw}) => {
+    const {adminClient, team, user, userClient, adminUser} = await pw.initSetup();
+
+    // Create second user and add to team
+    const secondUser = await pw.random.user('reviewer');
+    const {id: secondUserID} = await adminClient.createUser(secondUser, '', '');
+    await adminClient.addToTeam(team.id, secondUserID);
+    // Make system_admin so SystemAdminsAsReviewers: true covers them even if
+    // CommonReviewerIds is reset to [] by a concurrent initSetup() call.
+    await adminClient.updateUserRoles(secondUserID, 'system_user system_admin');
+
+    // Create third user and add to team
+    const thirdUser = await pw.random.user('reviewer');
+    const {id: thirdUserID} = await adminClient.createUser(thirdUser, '', '');
+    await adminClient.addToTeam(team.id, thirdUserID);
+    await adminClient.updateUserRoles(thirdUserID, 'system_user system_admin');
+
+    // Setup content flagging *after* roles are set
+    await setupContentFlagging(adminClient, [adminUser.id, secondUserID, thirdUserID]);
+
+    const message = `Post by @${user.username}, is flagged once`;
+
+    const {post} = await createPost(adminClient, userClient, team, user, message);
+    // Re-apply guard: concurrent initSetup() may reset EnableContentFlagging: false
+    // between the initial setupContentFlagging call and the flagPost call.
+    // pw.waitUntil confirms the config is actually true before proceeding — this
+    // closes the race window to < 100 ms (time between final poll and flagPost).
+    await setupContentFlagging(adminClient, [adminUser.id, secondUserID, thirdUserID]);
+    await pw.waitUntil(async () => {
+        const cfg = await adminClient.getConfig();
+        return cfg.ContentFlaggingSettings?.EnableContentFlagging === true;
+    });
+    await adminClient.flagPost(post.id, 'Classification mismatch', 'This message is inappropriate');
+
+    // Re-apply guard: concurrent initSetup() may have reset config between flagPost and login
+    await setupContentFlagging(adminClient, [adminUser.id, secondUserID, thirdUserID]);
+    await pw.waitUntil(async () => {
+        const cfg = await adminClient.getConfig();
+        return cfg.ContentFlaggingSettings?.EnableContentFlagging === true;
+    });
+
+    const {channelsPage: secondChannelsPage, contentReviewPage: secondContentReviewPage} =
+        await pw.testBrowser.login(secondUser);
+    await verifyAuthorNotification(post.id, secondChannelsPage, secondContentReviewPage, team.name, message, 'Pending');
+
+    const commentRemove = 'Removing this message as it violates the guidelines.';
+    const contentModerationMessage = 'Content deleted as part of Content Flagging review process';
+    await secondContentReviewPage.setReportCardByPostID(post.id);
+    await secondContentReviewPage.openViewDetails();
+    await secondContentReviewPage.waitForRHSVisible();
+
+    await secondContentReviewPage.openViewDetails();
+    await setupContentFlagging(adminClient, [adminUser.id, secondUserID, thirdUserID]);
+    await pw.waitUntil(async () => {
+        const cfg = await adminClient.getConfig();
+        return cfg.ContentFlaggingSettings?.EnableContentFlagging === true;
+    });
+    await secondContentReviewPage.clickRemoveMessage();
+    await secondContentReviewPage.enterConfirmationComment(commentRemove);
+
+    // New multi-step flow: Continue → wait for report to generate → Remove permanently
+    await secondContentReviewPage.submitFormAndWaitForReport();
+    await secondContentReviewPage.confirmRemovePermanently();
+    await setupContentFlagging(adminClient, [adminUser.id, secondUserID, thirdUserID]);
+
+    // After the remove action succeeds, the reviewer's own view of the flagged
+    // post should be replaced with the moderation placeholder rather than the
+    // original message that is now cleared from the redux store (MM-69043).
+    // The placeholder appears both in the RHS detail view and in the report
+    // card shown in the @content-review center channel — assert each scope
+    // separately so a regression in either location is caught.
+    await secondContentReviewPage.verifyFlaggedPostMessageInRHS(contentModerationMessage);
+    await secondContentReviewPage.verifyFlaggedPostMessageInCenter(post.id, contentModerationMessage);
+
+    const {channelsPage: channelsPageThird, contentReviewPage: contentReviewPageThird} =
+        await pw.testBrowser.login(thirdUser);
+    await verifyAuthorNotification(
+        post.id,
+        channelsPageThird,
+        contentReviewPageThird,
+        team.name,
+        contentModerationMessage,
+        'Removed',
+    );
+});