Files
upstream-atomic-crm/.claude/skills/grill-me/SKILL.md
upstream-mirror 93ecc1a6f8
Some checks failed
✅ Check / 🔬 ESLint (push) Failing after 21s
✅ Check / 🏷️ Typecheck (push) Failing after 11s
✅ Check / 🔎 Test (push) Failing after 11s
✅ Check / e2e-test (push) Failing after 11s
✅ Check / 🔨 Build (push) Failing after 11s
🚀 Deploy / 🚀 Deploy (doc) (push) Failing after 12s
🚀 Deploy / 🚀 Deploy (demo) (push) Failing after 12s
🚀 Deploy / 🚀 Deploy (supabase) (push) Failing after 18s
snapshot of https://github.com/marmelab/atomic-crm.git (main, 2026-09-18; blobs > 131072B omitted)
2026-09-18 01:48:50 +05:00

39 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown

---
name: grill-me
description: Interrogate a vague or broad feature request BEFORE dispatching the harness orchestrator, to surface what the user has not anticipated. Use in the main thread when a #harness request is underspecified, when scope seems broad, or when a plan would come out too generic. Not for the orchestrator (headless, cannot ask).
---
# grill-me
Ask probing questions about the request before any plan or code, to surface
what the user has NOT anticipated, not just confirm what they already said.
## How
- **One question at a time**, in prose. Never a multiple-choice menu, never a
batch of five at once.
- Read the answer, then ask the next most valuable question given it.
- **Stop as soon as the scope is answerable** (roughly: you could write the
orchestrator dispatch prompt without guessing). Do not interrogate for its
own sake.
## Cover, at minimum
1. **Scope-out**: what is explicitly NOT in scope? What might look included but isn't?
2. **Edge cases**: empty / invalid input, network or backend error, two users at once.
3. **Existing interactions**: does this touch behavior already in place (permissions,
RLS, cached data, shared views, another resource)?
4. **Definition of done**: what manual check confirms it works? Who validates before merge?
5. **Reversibility**: if it turns out wrong, how hard is it to undo?
If the user answers "I don't know" to a structural question, propose an explicit
hypothesis and ask them to confirm rather than silently choosing.
## After grilling
Fold the answers into the orchestrator dispatch prompt (scope-out and
acceptance become ticket constraints). Then dispatch the harness as usual.
The orchestrator never invokes this skill: it runs headless and cannot hold an
interactive back-and-forth. Grilling is a main-thread, pre-dispatch step.